New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗
Compare models

Explore DeepSeek V4 Flash’s published benchmark results and provider offerings below. More comparable task results are needed to describe its strongest areas.

Updated: Data as of:
Compare this model

Strongest results

Strongest results for DeepSeek V4 Flash in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined EloBusiness deliverables1,041 Elo#40 of 57
Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agentWorking in a terminal3%Joint #40 of 56
GDP.pdf ↗100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsProfessional document reasoning10.8%Joint #43 of 55

Model details

Open source / open weights4 benchmarks
Specifications for DeepSeek V4 Flash
ModelDeepSeek V4 Flash
Agent Index v1.2Insufficient coverage (3/7) · Preview
CreatorDeepSeek (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityOpen source / open weights
Context sizeNot reported
Max outputNot reported
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseNot reported

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

No provider pricing or performance reports have been added for this model yet.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for DeepSeek V4 Flash
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better1,041 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better10.8%selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better3%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
π-BenchOverall · PROCProactivity (PROC) · Higher is better60.6%completeness score: 57.7 · completeness uncertainty: 5.3 · metric: Avg PROC · personas: 5 · proc uncertainty: 1.1 · selection: Overall rows; not per-persona averages. COMP is a separate metric and does not determine this ranking. · tasks: 100π-Bench research team ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher