Work Automations
Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 46
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Across the task benchmarks we track, Claude Sonnet 4.5’s strongest relative results are in work automations. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 14.1%, ranking #46 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.
Updated: Data as of:
Strongest results
| Benchmark | Measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ↗Verified / mini-SWE-agent 2.0.0 / Bash Only | Coding agents | 71.4%#5 of 7 |
| AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657 | Work automations | 14.1%#46 of 55 |
| AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined Elo | Business deliverables | 714 Elo#49 of 57 |
| Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agent | Working in a terminal | 0%Joint #49 of 56 |
Model details
| Model | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|
| Agent Index v1.2 | Insufficient coverage (3/7) · Preview |
| Creator | Anthropic (opens in a new tab) |
| Availability | Proprietary |
| Context size | Not reported |
| Max output | Not reported |
| Knowledge cutoff | Not reported |
| License | Not reported |
Pricing and performance
Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.
No provider pricing or performance reports have been added for this model yet.
Benchmark performance
Claude Sonnet 4.5 in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.
AutomationBench-AA ↗
Reported benchmarks
All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.
| Benchmark | Score | Evaluation setup | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better | 714 Elo | selection: best reported configuration per release · Claude 4.5 Sonnet · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better | 14.1% | reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · Claude 4.5 Sonnet; private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50 | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better | 5.2% | selection: best reported configuration per release · Claude 4.5 Sonnet · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better | 17.8% | question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · Claude 4.5 Sonnet; original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking · subset: text · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| SWE-benchVerified / mini-SWE-agent 2.0.0 / Bash OnlyResolved · Higher is better | 71.4% | attempts: 1 · harness: mini-SWE-agent · harness version: 2.0.0 · reasoning effort: high · Official Bash Only leaderboard; mini-SWE-agent 2.0.0; 500 tasks; one attempt; effort high · tasks: 500 | SWE-bench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-02-17 |
| Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better | 0% | harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · Claude 4.5 Sonnet | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| τ²-benchStandard · OverallPass@1 · Higher is better | 76.4% | benchmark: tau2 · domains: retail, airline, telecom · metric: pass^1 · reasoning: enabled · selection: Standard checked; Custom and Legacy unchecked; Overall tab. Do not merge with banking, voice, legacy or custom results. · submitting organization: Sierra · track: Standard · user simulator: gpt-5.2 | Sierra ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |