Work Automations
Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Across the task benchmarks we track, MiniMax M3.1 Flash’s strongest relative results are in work automations and knowledge work. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 72.52%, ranking #4 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.
Updated: Data as of:
Strongest results
| Benchmark | Measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Index ↗v1.2 Preview | Overall agent capability | 39.8 / 100#13 of 26 |
| AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657 | Work automations | 72.52%#4 of 55 |
| Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subset | Expert reasoning | 48%#12 of 68 |
| LiveBench: Browser Use ↗2.0 / 2026-10-25 | Browser workflows | 80.6%#8 of 25 |
Model details
| Model | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|
| Agent Index v1.2 | 39.8 / 100 · Rank 13 · Preview |
| Creator | MiniMax (opens in a new tab) |
| Availability | Open source / open weights |
| Context size | 1,000,000 tokens (opens in a new tab) |
| Max output | 524,288 tokens (opens in a new tab) |
| Knowledge cutoff | Not reported |
| License | MINIMAX COMMUNITY LICENSE · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab) |
Pricing and performance
Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.
| Provider / configuration | Contexttokens | InputUSD / 1M tokens | OutputUSD / 1M tokens | LatencyTTFT · seconds | Speedtokens / sec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,048,576 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 0.634 (opens in a new tab) | 325.756 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 0.929 (opens in a new tab) | 160.733 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.1425 (opens in a new tab) | $0.57 (opens in a new tab) | 2.268 (opens in a new tab) | 219.719 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 262,144 | $0.30 (opens in a new tab) | $1.20 (opens in a new tab) | 1.403 (opens in a new tab) | 812.597 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 1.843 (opens in a new tab) | 89.294 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 0.904 (opens in a new tab) | 136.2 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 0.893 (opens in a new tab) | 209.151 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 1.723 (opens in a new tab) | 114.21 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 1.613 (opens in a new tab) | 127.737 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 0.849 (opens in a new tab) | 190.503 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,048,576 | $0.30 (opens in a new tab) | $1.20 (opens in a new tab) | 2.213 (opens in a new tab) | 159.122 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,000,000 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 2.739 (opens in a new tab) | 151.741 (opens in a new tab) |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 1,048,576 | $0.15 (opens in a new tab) | $0.60 (opens in a new tab) | 0.584 (opens in a new tab) | 140.861 (opens in a new tab) |
Benchmark performance
MiniMax M3.1 Flash in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.
AutomationBench-AA ↗
Knowledge Work
220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise Elo
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 21
Reported benchmarks
All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.
| Benchmark | Score | Evaluation setup | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better | 1,474.82 Elo | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better | 72.522% | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash; Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better | 72.5% | Artificial Analysis evaluation setup | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better | 20.8% | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better | 1,465.36 Elo | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash; 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise Elo | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better | 28.1% | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better | 48% | question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash; original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/minimax-m3-1-flash · subset: text · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| LiveBench: Agentic2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 28.8% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: agentic | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25 |
| LiveBench: Browser Use2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 80.6% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: browser-use | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25 |
| LiveBench: Coding2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 83.9% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: coding | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25 |
| LiveBench: Data Analysis2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 71.4% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: data-analysis | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25 |
| LiveBench: Design2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 74% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: design | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25 |
| LiveBench: Reasoning2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 82.9% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: reasoning | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25 |
| LiveBench: Research2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 72.7% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: research | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25 |
| Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better | 25.758% | harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |