Work Automations
Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 10
Muse Wonder 1.0
Across the task benchmarks we track, Muse Wonder 1.0’s strongest relative results are in work automations. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 68.1%, ranking #10 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.
Updated: Data as of:
🥇
Strongest results
| Benchmark | Measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Index ↗v1.2 Preview | Overall agent capability | 60.9 / 100#9 of 26 |
| LiveBench: Research ↗2.0 / 2026-10-25 | Research reports | 88%#1 of 25 |
| GDP.pdf ↗100 tasks / All-pass / five attempts | Professional document reasoning | 30.6%#4 of 55 |
| AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined Elo | Business deliverables | 1,659 Elo#5 of 57 |
Model details
| Model | Muse Wonder 1.0 |
|---|---|
| Agent Index v1.2 | 60.9 / 100 · Rank 9 · Preview |
| Creator | Meta (opens in a new tab) |
| Availability | Proprietary |
| Context size | 1,048,576 tokens (opens in a new tab) |
| Max output | Not reported |
| Knowledge cutoff | Not reported |
| License | Not reported |
Pricing and performance
Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.
| Provider / configuration | Contexttokens | InputUSD / 1M tokens | OutputUSD / 1M tokens | LatencyTTFT · seconds | Speedtokens / sec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard API, uncached input | 1,048,576 | $4.00 (opens in a new tab) | $20.00 (opens in a new tab) | Not reported | Not reported |
Benchmark performance
Muse Wonder 1.0 in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.
AutomationBench-AA ↗
Reported benchmarks
All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.
| Benchmark | Score | Evaluation setup | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better | 1,659 Elo | selection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Wonder (max) · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better | 68.1% | reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · Muse Wonder (max); private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/muse-wonder · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50 | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better | 30.6% | selection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Wonder (max) · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better | 39% | selection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Wonder (max) · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better | 50.1% | question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · Muse Wonder (max); original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/muse-wonder · subset: text · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| LiveBench: Agentic2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 52.6% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: agentic | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Browser Use2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 60% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: browser-use | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Coding2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 86.2% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: coding | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Data Analysis2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 81.6% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: data-analysis | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Design2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 75.1% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: design | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Reasoning2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 90.6% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: reasoning | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Research2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 88% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: research | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better | 52% | harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Wonder (max) | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |