Work Automations
Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 16
GPT-6.1 Terra
Across the task benchmarks we track, GPT-6.1 Terra’s strongest relative results are in work automations. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 60.2%, ranking #16 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.
Updated: Data as of:
Strongest results
| Benchmark | Measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Index ↗v1.2 Preview | Overall agent capability | 67.4 / 100#7 of 26 |
| LiveBench: Browser Use ↗2.0 / 2026-10-25 | Browser workflows | 93.1%#2 of 25 |
| GDP.pdf ↗100 tasks / All-pass / five attempts | Professional document reasoning | 28.6%#6 of 55 |
| LiveBench: Data Analysis ↗2.0 / 2026-10-25 | Data analysis | 82.3%#4 of 25 |
Model details
| Model | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|
| Agent Index v1.2 | 67.4 / 100 · Rank 7 · Preview |
| Creator | OpenAI (opens in a new tab) |
| Availability | Proprietary |
| Context size | 1,050,000 tokens (opens in a new tab) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (opens in a new tab) |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-06-01 |
| License | Not reported |
Pricing and performance
Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.
| Provider / configuration | Contexttokens | InputUSD / 1M tokens | OutputUSD / 1M tokens | LatencyTTFT · seconds | Speedtokens / sec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard API, prompts up to 272K input tokens | 1,050,000 | $1.00 (opens in a new tab) | $5.00 (opens in a new tab) | Not reported | Not reported |
| Standard API, prompts above 272K input tokens | 1,050,000 | $2.00 (opens in a new tab) | $7.50 (opens in a new tab) | Not reported | Not reported |
Benchmark performance
GPT-6.1 Terra in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.
AutomationBench-AA ↗
Reported benchmarks
All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.
| Benchmark | Score | Evaluation setup | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better | 1,402 Elo | selection: best reported configuration per release · GPT-6.1 Terra (max) · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better | 60.2% | reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · GPT-6.1 Terra (max); private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/gpt-6-1-terra · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50 | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better | 28.6% | selection: best reported configuration per release · GPT-6.1 Terra (max) · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better | 47.3% | selection: best reported configuration per release · GPT-6.1 Terra (max) · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better | 46.2% | question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · GPT-6.1 Terra (max); original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/gpt-6-1-terra · subset: text · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| LiveBench: Agentic2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 48.6% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: agentic | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Browser Use2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 93.1% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: browser-use | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Coding2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 94.3% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: coding | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Data Analysis2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 82.3% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: data-analysis | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Design2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 82.3% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: design | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Reasoning2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 88.7% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: reasoning | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Research2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 73.9% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: research | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better | 55.6% | harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · GPT-6.1 Terra (max) | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |