New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

Across the task benchmarks we track, Gemini 4 Carbon’s strongest relative results are in work automations and knowledge work. On AutomationBench 1.0.6, it scores 53.88%, ranking #1 among 17 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:
🥇

Strongest results

Strongest results for Gemini 4 Carbon in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657Work automations77.8%#1 of 55
AutomationBench ↗1.0.6 / Zapier held-out private setWork automations53.88%#1 of 17
HLE-Diamond ↗1,000 questions / no toolsAdvanced knowledge and reasoning69.1%#1 of 35
Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agentWorking in a terminal65.15%#2 of 56

Model details

Proprietary7 benchmarks
Specifications for Gemini 4 Carbon
ModelGemini 4 Carbon
Agent Index v1.2Insufficient coverage (4/7) · Preview
CreatorGoogle (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityProprietary
Context size1,000,000 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Max outputNot reported (opens in a new tab)
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseNot reported

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

Provider offerings for Gemini 4 Carbon
Provider / configurationContexttokensInputUSD / 1M tokensOutputUSD / 1M tokensLatencyTTFT · secondsSpeedtokens / sec
Gemini 4 Carbon (high)1,000,000$4.00 (opens in a new tab)$20.00 (opens in a new tab)156.309 (opens in a new tab)94.625 (opens in a new tab)

Benchmark performance

Gemini 4 Carbon in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better1,610 Eloselection: publisher default displayed configuration · Gemini 4 Carbon (high)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench1.0.6 / Zapier held-out private setStrict task completion · Higher is better31.51%Gemini 4 Carbon (Low); private held-out 657 tasks; API mode; 50-step cap; strict completionZapier ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
AutomationBench1.0.6 / Zapier held-out private setStrict task completion · Higher is better52.97%Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium); private held-out 657 tasks; API mode; 50-step cap; strict completionZapier ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
AutomationBench1.0.6 / Zapier held-out private setStrict task completion · Higher is better53.88%Gemini 4 Carbon (High); private held-out 657 tasks; API mode; 50-step cap; strict completionZapier ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better77.8%highArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better29.6%selection: best reported configuration per release · Gemini 4 Carbon (medium) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better28.4%selection: publisher default displayed configuration · Gemini 4 Carbon (high)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,732.68 EloGemini 4 Carbon (High); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better69.1%selection: best reported configuration per release · Gemini 4 Carbon (High) · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better65.152%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent