New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

Across the task benchmarks we track, Muse Spark 1.3’s strongest relative results are in reasoning, knowledge work, and work automations. On GPQA Diamond, it scores 94.1%, ranking joint #3 among 30 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:

Strongest results

Strongest results for Muse Spark 1.3 in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
Agent Index ↗v1.2 PreviewOverall agent capability35.1 / 100#16 of 26
GPQA ↗Diamond / Artificial AnalysisReasoning94.14%Joint #3 of 30
GDP.pdf ↗100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsProfessional document reasoning26.6%#8 of 55
Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subsetExpert reasoning48.7%Joint #10 of 68

Model details

Proprietary18 benchmarks
Specifications for Muse Spark 1.3
ModelMuse Spark 1.3
Agent Index v1.235.1 / 100 · Rank 16 · Preview
CreatorMeta (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityProprietary
Context size1,000,000 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Max outputNot reported (opens in a new tab)
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseNot reported

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

Provider offerings for Muse Spark 1.3
Provider / configurationContexttokensInputUSD / 1M tokensOutputUSD / 1M tokensLatencyTTFT · secondsSpeedtokens / sec
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)1,048,576$1.25 (opens in a new tab)$4.25 (opens in a new tab)45.675 (opens in a new tab)195.207 (opens in a new tab)

Benchmark performance

Muse Spark 1.3 in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better1,581 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Spark 1.3 (max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench1.0.6 / Zapier held-out private setStrict task completion · Higher is better20.7%Muse Spark 1.3 (Max); private held-out 657 tasks; API mode; 50-step cap; strict completionZapier ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better57.9%reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · Muse Spark 1.3 (max); private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/muse-spark-1-3 · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better26.6%selection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Spark 1.3 (max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,631.96 EloMuse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,680.99 EloMuse Spark 1.3 (Max); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GPQADiamond / Artificial AnalysisAccuracy · Higher is better94.141%Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh); 198-question Diamond subset; independent AA evaluationArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GPQADiamond / Artificial AnalysisAccuracy · Higher is better93.535%Muse Spark 1.3 (Max); 198-question Diamond subset; independent AA evaluationArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better33.7%selection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better48.7%question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · Muse Spark 1.3 (max); original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/muse-spark-1-3 · subset: text · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
LiveBench: Agentic2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better25.5%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: agenticLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Browser Use2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better30.9%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: browser-useLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Coding2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better90.2%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: codingLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Data Analysis2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better79.6%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: data-analysisLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Design2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better74.8%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: designLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Reasoning2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better89.7%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: reasoningLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Research2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better68.6%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: researchLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
OSWorld2.1 / full setBinary accuracy · Higher is better39.25%max; batch tool; v2.1; full setOSWorld / XLang ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
Terminal-Bench4.0Task success · Higher is better14.5%Muse Code; effort=xhigh; 14.5% ± 2.9%Terminal-Bench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better33.333%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent