New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

Across the task benchmarks we track, GLM-5.3’s strongest relative results are in work automations, knowledge work, and reasoning. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 62.2%, ranking #13 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:

Strongest results

Strongest results for GLM-5.3 in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
Agent Index ↗v1.2 PreviewOverall agent capability27.3 / 100#19 of 26
AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657Work automations62.2%#13 of 55
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Knowledge work1,656.88 Elo#10 of 38
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined EloBusiness deliverables1,504.57 Elo#15 of 57

Model details

Open source / open weights15 benchmarks
Specifications for GLM-5.3
ModelGLM-5.3
Agent Index v1.227.3 / 100 · Rank 19 · Preview
CreatorZ.ai (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityOpen source / open weights
Context size1,000,000 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Max output131,072 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseGLM-5.3 License · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

Provider offerings for GLM-5.3
Provider / configurationContexttokensInputUSD / 1M tokensOutputUSD / 1M tokensLatencyTTFT · secondsSpeedtokens / sec
GLM-5.3 (max)1,048,576$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)2.822 (opens in a new tab)106.426 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max) (FAST)1,000,000$2.10 (opens in a new tab)$6.60 (opens in a new tab)0.795 (opens in a new tab)276.567 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$0.63 (opens in a new tab)$1.98 (opens in a new tab)1.588 (opens in a new tab)156.031 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4)786,432$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.723 (opens in a new tab)269.762 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.925 (opens in a new tab)154.356 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,048,575$0.5625 (opens in a new tab)$2.50 (opens in a new tab)1.01 (opens in a new tab)129.923 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,048,576$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.837 (opens in a new tab)58.931 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$1.26 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)0.793 (opens in a new tab)139.209 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$0.70 (opens in a new tab)$2.20 (opens in a new tab)2.735 (opens in a new tab)125.736 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)163,840$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)1.539 (opens in a new tab)96.309 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max) (FAST)1,000,000$2.80 (opens in a new tab)$8.80 (opens in a new tab)0.913 (opens in a new tab)482.734 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4 ULTRA CHAT)1,048,576$2.10 (opens in a new tab)$6.60 (opens in a new tab)Not reportedNot reported
GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4)1,048,576$1.05 (opens in a new tab)$3.30 (opens in a new tab)0.91 (opens in a new tab)373.189 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,048,576$0.14 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)1.309 (opens in a new tab)121.54 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.682 (opens in a new tab)203.893 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,048,576$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.634 (opens in a new tab)187.466 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$0.20 (opens in a new tab)$0.64 (opens in a new tab)1.284 (opens in a new tab)214.631 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4)1,000,000$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)1.492 (opens in a new tab)238.818 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)1.938 (opens in a new tab)90.783 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.873 (opens in a new tab)217.437 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)262,144$2.09 (opens in a new tab)$6.38 (opens in a new tab)1.268 (opens in a new tab)265.356 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4)1,000,000$0.63 (opens in a new tab)$1.98 (opens in a new tab)1.814 (opens in a new tab)207.47 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4, FAST)1,000,000$2.80 (opens in a new tab)$8.80 (opens in a new tab)1.386 (opens in a new tab)561.789 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$0.50 (opens in a new tab)$1.00 (opens in a new tab)0.947 (opens in a new tab)688.217 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,048,575$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.597 (opens in a new tab)188.682 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)0.891 (opens in a new tab)157.852 (opens in a new tab)
GLM-5.3 (max)1,000,000$1.40 (opens in a new tab)$4.40 (opens in a new tab)1.477 (opens in a new tab)88.436 (opens in a new tab)

Benchmark performance

GLM-5.3 in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for GLM-5.3
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better1,504.57 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · GLM-5.3 (Max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better62.203%GLM-5.3 (Max); Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completionArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better51.979%GLM-5.3 (Low); Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completionArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
DeepSWEv1.1Pass@1 · Higher is better69%mini-swe-agent; effort=max; ±3 percentage pointsDatacurve ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
DeepSWEv1.1Pass@1 · Higher is better69%max; ±3 percentage pointsDatacurve ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better11.2%selection: best reported configuration per release · GLM-5.3 (Max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,656.88 EloGLM-5.3 (Max); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,333.34 EloGLM-5.3 (Low); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GPQADiamond / Artificial AnalysisAccuracy · Higher is better91.717%GLM-5.3 (Max); 198-question Diamond subset; independent AA evaluationArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better17.9%selection: best reported configuration per release · GLM-5.3 (Max) · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Humanity's Last ExamHLE — source does not specify subsetAccuracy · Higher is better62.5%temperature=1.0; top_p=0.95; max generation 163840 tokens; max context 300000 tokens; context management; GPT-5.6 Luna medium judge. · subset: unspecified · Tools enabledZ.ai ↗ (opens in a new tab)provider reported · 2026-08-14
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better42.3%question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · GLM-5.3 (max); original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/glm-5-3 · subset: text · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
LiveBench: Agentic2.0 / 2026-10-14Accuracy · Higher is better35.9%release: 2026-10-14 · Official LiveBench 2.0 row GLM-5.3. One run per suite; effort not explicitly labeled on this row. Historical release, not the October 25 index track. · source model id: glm-5.3 · suite: agenticLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-14
LiveBench: Browser Use2.0 / 2026-10-14Accuracy · Higher is better0%release: 2026-10-14 · Official LiveBench 2.0 row GLM-5.3. One run per suite; effort not explicitly labeled on this row. Historical release, not the October 25 index track. · source model id: glm-5.3 · suite: browser-useLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-14
LiveBench: Coding2.0 / 2026-10-14Accuracy · Higher is better82.8%release: 2026-10-14 · Official LiveBench 2.0 row GLM-5.3. One run per suite; effort not explicitly labeled on this row. Historical release, not the October 25 index track. · source model id: glm-5.3 · suite: codingLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-14
Terminal-Bench2.1 / Artificial AnalysisPass@1 · Higher is better83.895%GLM-5.3 (Max); 89 tasks; Terminus 2; e2b; three repeatsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench4.0Task success · Higher is better41.8%Claude Code; effort=max; 41.8% ± 3.2%Terminal-Bench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better41.919%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · GLM-5.3 (Max)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent