Work Automations
Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 20
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Across the task benchmarks we track, MiMo-V2.6-Pro’s strongest relative results are in work automations. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 58.6%, ranking #20 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.
Updated: Data as of:
Strongest results
| Benchmark | Measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Index ↗v1.2 Preview | Overall agent capability | 40.9 / 100#11 of 26 |
| Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subset | Expert reasoning | 49.4%#9 of 68 |
| AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined Elo | Business deliverables | 1,512 Elo#14 of 57 |
| Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agent | Working in a terminal | 34.8%#16 of 56 |
Model details
| Model | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|
| Agent Index v1.2 | 40.9 / 100 · Rank 11 · Preview |
| Creator | Xiaomi (opens in a new tab) |
| Availability | Open source / open weights |
| Context size | Not reported |
| Max output | Not reported |
| Knowledge cutoff | Not reported |
| License | MIT · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab) |
Pricing and performance
Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.
| Provider / configuration | Contexttokens | InputUSD / 1M tokens | OutputUSD / 1M tokens | LatencyTTFT · seconds | Speedtokens / sec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard API, USD, uncached input | Not reported | $0.435 (opens in a new tab) | $0.87 (opens in a new tab) | Not reported | Not reported |
Benchmark performance
MiMo-V2.6-Pro in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.
AutomationBench-AA ↗
Reported benchmarks
All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.
| Benchmark | Score | Evaluation setup | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better | 1,512 Elo | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiMo-V2.6-Pro · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better | 58.6% | reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · MiMo-V2.6-Pro; private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/mimo-v2-6-pro · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50 | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better | 19.2% | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiMo-V2.6-Pro · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better | 15.2% | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiMo-V2.6-Pro · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better | 49.4% | question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro; original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/mimo-v2-6-pro · subset: text · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| LiveBench: Agentic2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 35.2% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: agentic | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Browser Use2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 77.3% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: browser-use | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Coding2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 81.5% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: coding | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Data Analysis2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 72.3% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: data-analysis | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Design2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 78.5% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: design | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Reasoning2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 79.6% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: reasoning | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| LiveBench: Research2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better | 76.7% | release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: research | LiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |
| Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better | 34.8% | harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |