Work Automations
Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 50
MiniMax M2.7
Across the task benchmarks we track, MiniMax M2.7’s strongest relative results are in work automations. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 4.4%, ranking #50 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.
Updated: Data as of:
Strongest results
| Benchmark | Measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| IFBench ↗58 constraint types | Precise instruction following | 75.7%#11 of 17 |
| Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subset | Expert reasoning | 29.6%#51 of 68 |
| AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined Elo | Business deliverables | 719 Elo#48 of 57 |
| Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agent | Working in a terminal | 0%Joint #49 of 56 |
Model details
| Model | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|
| Agent Index v1.2 | Insufficient coverage (3/7) · Preview |
| Creator | MiniMax (opens in a new tab) |
| Availability | Open source / open weights |
| Context size | Not reported |
| Max output | Not reported |
| Knowledge cutoff | Not reported |
| License | Not reported · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab) |
Pricing and performance
Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.
No provider pricing or performance reports have been added for this model yet.
Benchmark performance
MiniMax M2.7 in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.
AutomationBench-AA ↗
Reported benchmarks
All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.
| Benchmark | Score | Evaluation setup | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better | 719 Elo | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiniMax-M2.7 · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better | 4.4% | reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · MiniMax-M2.7; private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/minimax-m2-7 · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50 | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better | 6% | selection: best reported configuration per release · MiniMax-M2.7 · tools: benchmark-defined | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better | 29.6% | question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · MiniMax-M2.7; original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/minimax-m2-7 · subset: text · No tools | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| IFBench58 constraint typesAccuracy · Higher is better | 75.7% | selection: publisher default displayed configuration · MiniMax-M2.7 | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better | 0% | harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · MiniMax-M2.7 | Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent |
| π-BenchOverall · PROCProactivity (PROC) · Higher is better | 55.6% | completeness score: 60 · completeness uncertainty: 1.8 · metric: Avg PROC · personas: 5 · proc uncertainty: 3.2 · selection: Overall rows; not per-persona averages. COMP is a separate metric and does not determine this ranking. · tasks: 100 | π-Bench research team ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher |