New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

Across the task benchmarks we track, Qwen3-14B’s strongest relative results are in work automations. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 0.2%, ranking #53 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:

Strongest results

Strongest results for Qwen3-14B in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agentWorking in a terminal0%Joint #49 of 56
AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657Work automations0.2%#53 of 55
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined EloBusiness deliverables0 EloJoint #55 of 57
Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subsetExpert reasoning4.5%#66 of 68

Model details

Open source / open weights6 benchmarks
Specifications for Qwen3-14B
ModelQwen3-14B
Agent Index v1.2Insufficient coverage (3/7) · Preview
CreatorQwen (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityOpen source / open weights
Context sizeNot reported
Max outputNot reported
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseNot reported · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

No provider pricing or performance reports have been added for this model yet.

Benchmark performance

Qwen3-14B in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for Qwen3-14B
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better0 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · Qwen3 14B · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AppWorldTest-ChallengeTask Goal Completion · Higher is better67.6%agent: Alibaba Cloud ApsaraLab AgentRL · metric: TGC · selection: All 23 leaderboard submissions; latest report date and best score at that date shown per model. Normal-split and SGC values retained in the source data/settings, not mixed into the ranking. · source model label: Qwen3-14B · split: Test-Challenge · test challenge sgc: 50.4 · test normal sgc: 80.4 · test normal tgc: 86.9AppWorld research team ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-02-15
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better0.2%reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · Qwen3 14B; private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/qwen3-14b-instruct-reasoning · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better1.2%selection: best reported configuration per release · Qwen3 14B · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better4.5%question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · Qwen3 14B; original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/qwen3-14b-instruct-reasoning · subset: text · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better0%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · Qwen3 14BArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent