New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

Across the task benchmarks we track, Qwen 3.5 9B’s strongest relative results are in work automations. On AutomationBench-AA, it scores 1%, ranking #51 among 55 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:

Strongest results

Strongest results for Qwen 3.5 9B in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agentWorking in a terminal0.5%#48 of 56
GDP.pdf ↗100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsProfessional document reasoning6.6%#49 of 55
Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subsetExpert reasoning14.9%#62 of 68
AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657Work automations1%#51 of 55

Model details

Open source / open weights7 benchmarks
Specifications for Qwen 3.5 9B
ModelQwen 3.5 9B
Agent Index v1.2Insufficient coverage (4/7) · Preview
CreatorQwen (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityOpen source / open weights
Context sizeNot reported
Max outputNot reported
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseNot reported · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

No provider pricing or performance reports have been added for this model yet.

Benchmark performance

Qwen 3.5 9B in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for Qwen 3.5 9B
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better341 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · Qwen3.5 9B · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better1%reported precision decimals: 1 · result quality: reported · Qwen3.5 9B; private held-out 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completion with zero credit for any guardrail violation. · source model href: /models/qwen3-5-9b · task count: 657 · Tools enabled · turn cap: 50Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better6.6%selection: best reported configuration per release · Qwen3.5 9B · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better4.8%selection: best reported configuration per release · Qwen3.5 9B · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better14.9%question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · Qwen3.5 9B; original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/qwen3-5-9b · subset: text · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
MyPCBench184 tasks · 100 stepsPerfect-task rate · Higher is better6.5%interface: computer + bash · judge: gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview · max steps: 100 · rubric score percent: 24.1 · selection: Canonical matched-protocol rows only; four 200-step self-reported rows retained in source snapshot, excluded from this track. · tasks: 184MyPCBench / Carnegie Mellon University ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better0.5%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · Qwen3.5 9BArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent