New: Claude Fable 5.2 eval report is here.Read the report ↗

Best LLMs for wide web research

WANDR

Tests collecting and organizing facts across a broad research assignment, helping you assess AI support for client research that involves many separate lookups. This offline-search soft-F1 evaluation differs from live-web runs and is not a project-completion percentage.

Updated: Data as of:
Limited reportingNot saturated
Official benchmark
WANDR results. Each row identifies its benchmark version and evaluation track. Scores from different versions are not directly comparable. Best effort from the latest stored report date per model and version.
Model / creatorVersionReported score
Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic · ProprietaryAnthropic offline / relaxed soft F182.1%
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic · ProprietaryAnthropic offline / relaxed soft F172.3%
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic · ProprietaryAnthropic offline / relaxed soft F168.7%
View all 3 published reports
Anthropic offline / relaxed soft F1

effort: max · 500 tasks; modified soft F1; frozen web index; Opus 4.6 grader; 980K budget. Not directly comparable with Perplexity live-web runs. · Tools enabled

Anthropic ↗
Anthropic offline / relaxed soft F1

effort: highest available · November 9 launch-table comparison; highest available effort unless explicitly noted. Preserve the benchmark track and model configuration; competitor figures are as reported by Anthropic. · Tools enabled

Anthropic ↗
Anthropic offline / relaxed soft F1

effort: highest available · November 9 launch-table comparison; highest available effort unless explicitly noted. Preserve the benchmark track and model configuration; competitor figures are as reported by Anthropic. · Tools enabled

Anthropic ↗