New: Claude Fable 5.2 eval report is here.Read the report ↗

Best LLMs for legal work

Harvey LAB-AA

Tests whether an agent can produce legal deliverables that meet every requirement without material hallucinations, helping you assess how much drafting and document work you could delegate before professional review. These results use the private 120-task v1.1 evaluation, not earlier LAB scoring.

Updated: Data as of:
Limited reportingNot saturated
Official benchmark
Harvey LAB-AA results. Each row identifies its benchmark version and evaluation track. Scores from different versions are not directly comparable. Best effort from the latest stored report date per model and version.
Model / creatorVersionReported score
Grok 4.7xAI · Proprietary1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated9.4%
Muse Spark 1.3Meta · Proprietary1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated8.9%
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · Proprietary1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated8.6%
Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic · Proprietary1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated7.2%
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI · Proprietary1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated6.9%
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic · Proprietary1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated6.4%
Kimi K3Moonshot AI · Open source / open weights1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated5.3%
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic · Proprietary1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated4.2%
View all 8 published reports
1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated

effort: xhigh · harness: Stirrup · October 8 published v1.1 snapshot; hallucination-gated all-pass rate; not an inferred latest leaderboard value. · Tools enabled

1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated

effort: max · harness: Stirrup · October 8 published v1.1 snapshot; hallucination-gated all-pass rate; not an inferred latest leaderboard value. · Tools enabled

1.1 / private 120 / hallucination-gated

effort: max · harness: Stirrup · October 8 published v1.1 snapshot; hallucination-gated all-pass rate; not an inferred latest leaderboard value. · Tools enabled