New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

Across the task benchmarks we track, Kimi K3’s strongest relative results are in terminal use, web research, and reasoning. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, it scores 85%, ranking #1 among 13 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:

Strongest results

Strongest results for Kimi K3 in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
Agent Index ↗v1.2 PreviewOverall agent capability31.3 / 100#17 of 26
BrowseComp ↗Published open-model reportsWeb research91.2%#2 of 8
Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subsetExpert reasoning46.9%#15 of 68
GPQA ↗Diamond / Artificial AnalysisReasoning93.54%Joint #8 of 30

Model details

Open source / open weights21 benchmarks
Specifications for Kimi K3
ModelKimi K3
Agent Index v1.231.3 / 100 · Rank 17 · Preview
CreatorMoonshot AI (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityOpen source / open weights
Context size1,048,576 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Max output1,048,576 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseKimi K3 License · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

Provider offerings for Kimi K3
Provider / configurationContexttokensInputUSD / 1M tokensOutputUSD / 1M tokensLatencyTTFT · secondsSpeedtokens / sec
Kimi K3 (max)1,000,000$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.421 (opens in a new tab)216.139 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.302 (opens in a new tab)90.056 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)204,800$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)0.87 (opens in a new tab)115.162 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.224 (opens in a new tab)30.426 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)0.961 (opens in a new tab)113.916 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,000,000$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.778 (opens in a new tab)175.272 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max) (FAST)1,048,576$6.00 (opens in a new tab)$30.00 (opens in a new tab)1.659 (opens in a new tab)481.694 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)5.977 (opens in a new tab)64.916 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max) (ULTRA CHAT)1,048,576$5.60 (opens in a new tab)$28.00 (opens in a new tab)Not reportedNot reported
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$0.65 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.133 (opens in a new tab)84.476 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)0.933 (opens in a new tab)143.314 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.047 (opens in a new tab)212.032 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.187 (opens in a new tab)165.949 (opens in a new tab)
Kimi K3 (max)1,048,576$3.00 (opens in a new tab)$15.00 (opens in a new tab)1.319 (opens in a new tab)43.821 (opens in a new tab)

Benchmark performance

Kimi K3 in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for Kimi K3
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better1,498.42 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · Kimi K3 (Max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench1.0.6 / Zapier held-out private setStrict task completion · Higher is better22.68%Kimi K3; private held-out 657 tasks; API mode; 50-step cap; strict completionZapier ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better58.273%Kimi K3 (Max); Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completionArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better49.257%Kimi K3 (Low); Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completionArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
BrowseCompPublished open-model reportsAccuracy · Higher is better91.2%harness comparison: provider-reported; settings differ across models · Max effort; temperature 1; top_p 1; context compaction triggered at 300K tokens. Primary General Agents benchmark image. Separate no-management 1M track scores 90.4.Moonshot AI ↗ (opens in a new tab)provider reported
DeepSWEv1.1Pass@1 · Higher is better69%mini-swe-agent; effort=max; ±5 percentage pointsDatacurve ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better22%selection: best reported configuration per release · Kimi K3 (Max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,542.76 EloKimi K3 (Max); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,135.77 EloKimi K3 (Low); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GPQADiamond / Artificial AnalysisAccuracy · Higher is better93.535%Kimi K3 (Max); 198-question Diamond subset; independent AA evaluationArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GPQADiamond / Artificial AnalysisAccuracy · Higher is better84.242%Kimi K3 (Low); 198-question Diamond subset; independent AA evaluationArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better26.9%selection: best reported configuration per release · Kimi K3 (Max) · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Humanity's Last ExamHLE — source does not specify subsetAccuracy · Higher is better59.8%temperature=1.0; top_p=0.95; max generation 163840 tokens; max context 300000 tokens; context management; GPT-5.6 Luna medium judge. · subset: unspecified · Tools enabledZ.ai ↗ (opens in a new tab)other · 2026-08-14
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — full setAccuracy · Higher is better43.5%Max effort; temperature=1.0; top_p=0.95. · subset: full · No toolsMoonshot AI ↗ (opens in a new tab)provider reported
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — full setAccuracy · Higher is better56%Max effort; temperature=1.0; top_p=1.0; general tools. · subset: full · Tools enabledMoonshot AI ↗ (opens in a new tab)provider reported
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better46.9%question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · Kimi K3 (max); original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/kimi-k3 · subset: text · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
LiveBench: Agentic2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better26.4%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: agenticLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Browser Use2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better75.2%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: browser-useLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Coding2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better59.3%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: codingLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Data Analysis2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better78.7%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: data-analysisLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Design2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better77.2%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: designLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Reasoning2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better90.7%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: reasoningLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
LiveBench: Research2.0 / 2026-10-25Accuracy · Higher is better79%release: 2026-10-25 · Highest supported effort unless publisher reports an exception; single run · suite: researchLiveBench ↗ (opens in a new tab)benchmark publisher · 2026-10-25
Terminal-Bench2.1 / Artificial AnalysisPass@1 · Higher is better85.019%Kimi K3 (Max); 89 tasks; Terminus 2; e2b; three repeatsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench2.1 / Artificial AnalysisPass@1 · Higher is better82.397%Kimi K3 (Low); 89 tasks; Terminus 2; e2b; three repeatsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better12.626%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · Kimi K3 (Low)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent