New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Across the task benchmarks we track, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813’s strongest relative results are in terminal use, reasoning, and work automations. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, it scores 78.7%, ranking #4 among 13 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:

Strongest results

Strongest results for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
GPQA ↗Diamond / Artificial AnalysisReasoning92.83%#11 of 30
AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657Work automations56.71%#23 of 55
Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subsetExpert reasoning41%#30 of 68
Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agentWorking in a terminal14.14%Joint #29 of 56

Model details

Open source / open weights10 benchmarks
Specifications for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ModelDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Agent Index v1.2Insufficient coverage (4/7) · Preview
CreatorDeepSeek (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityOpen source / open weights
Context size1,000,000 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Max output393,216 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseMIT · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

Provider offerings for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Provider / configurationContexttokensInputUSD / 1M tokensOutputUSD / 1M tokensLatencyTTFT · secondsSpeedtokens / sec
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,000,000$1.32 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)1.589 (opens in a new tab)143.882 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,000,000$1.32 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)Not reportedNot reported
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,000,000$1.30 (opens in a new tab)$2.60 (opens in a new tab)1.129 (opens in a new tab)78.412 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,048,576$1.32 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)1.793 (opens in a new tab)89.952 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,048,576$1.32 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)0.832 (opens in a new tab)57.677 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,048,576$1.056 (opens in a new tab)$3.168 (opens in a new tab)3.152 (opens in a new tab)71.407 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,048,576$1.32 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)1.602 (opens in a new tab)172.165 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,048,576$1.32 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)2.123 (opens in a new tab)72.307 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,048,576$1.32 (opens in a new tab)$3.96 (opens in a new tab)2.088 (opens in a new tab)64.823 (opens in a new tab)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)1,048,576$0.50 (opens in a new tab)$2.00 (opens in a new tab)1.894 (opens in a new tab)305.002 (opens in a new tab)

Benchmark performance

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better1,254.44 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better34.909%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning); Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completionArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better56.712%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max); Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completionArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better11.4%selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,066.05 EloDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better1,457.37 EloDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GPQADiamond / Artificial AnalysisAccuracy · Higher is better92.828%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max); 198-question Diamond subset; independent AA evaluationArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
HLE-Diamond1,000 questions / no toolsAccuracy · Higher is better19.5%selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Humanity's Last ExamHLE — source does not specify subsetAccuracy · Higher is better42.7%subset: unspecified · No toolsDeepSeek ↗ (opens in a new tab)provider reported · 2026-08-13
Humanity's Last ExamHLE — source does not specify subsetAccuracy · Higher is better60%subset: unspecified · Tools enabledDeepSeek ↗ (opens in a new tab)provider reported · 2026-08-13
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better41%question count: 2158 · reported precision decimals: 1 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max); original HLE; 2,158 text-only questions; no tools; pass@1; chart labels rounded to one decimal. · source model href: /models/deepseek-v4-pro · subset: text · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench2.1 / Artificial AnalysisPass@1 · Higher is better78.652%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max); 89 tasks; Terminus 2; e2b; three repeatsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better14.141%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent