New: Agent Index for knowledge work is live.Explore the index ↗

DeepSeek R1 (Jan 2025)

Across the task benchmarks we track, DeepSeek R1 (Jan 2025)’s strongest relative results are in terminal use, work automations, and reasoning. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, it scores 19.1%, ranking #12 among 13 models with reported results in our dataset.

Updated: Data as of:

Strongest results

Strongest results for DeepSeek R1 (Jan 2025) in tracked evaluation cohorts
BenchmarkMeasuresScore
Terminal-Bench ↗4.0 / mini-swe-agentWorking in a terminal0%Joint #49 of 56
Humanity's Last Exam ↗Stable HLE — text-only subsetExpert reasoning8.5%#64 of 68
AutomationBench-AA ↗1.0.6 / AA private 657Work automations0.24%#52 of 55
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 / combined EloBusiness deliverables128.91 Elo#54 of 57

Model details

Open source / open weights10 benchmarks
Specifications for DeepSeek R1 (Jan 2025)
ModelDeepSeek R1 (Jan 2025)
Agent Index v1.2Insufficient coverage (3/7) · Preview
CreatorDeepSeek (opens in a new tab)
AvailabilityOpen source / open weights
Context size128,000 tokens (opens in a new tab)
Max outputNot reported
Knowledge cutoffNot reported
LicenseMIT · Model weights ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Pricing and performance

Per provider and reported configuration. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.

No provider pricing or performance reports have been added for this model yet.

Benchmark performance

DeepSeek R1 (Jan 2025) in color, alongside leading models. Latest stored reports, best effort per report date.

Reported benchmarks

All published results in our dataset, with versions, evaluation settings, and sources.

All published benchmark reports for DeepSeek R1 (Jan 2025)
BenchmarkScoreEvaluation setupSource
AA-Briefcase1.1 / combined EloCombined Elo · Higher is better128.91 Eloselection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
AutomationBench-AA1.0.6 / AA private 657Objectives completed without guardrail violations · Higher is better0.242%DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25); Private 657 tasks; 50 turns; objective completionArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDP.pdf100 tasks / All-pass / five attemptsAccuracy · Higher is better2.4%selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GDPval-AA2.1Elo · Higher is better302.47 EloDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25); 220 tasks; Stirrup agent; pairwise EloArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
GPQADiamond / Artificial AnalysisAccuracy · Higher is better70.808%DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25); 198-question Diamond subset; independent AA evaluationArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Humanity's Last ExamStable HLE — text-only subsetAccuracy · Higher is better8.5%DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25); original HLE text-only 2,158 questions; no tools; not HLE Diamond · No toolsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
IFBench58 constraint typesAccuracy · Higher is better38.98%selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) · tools: benchmark-definedArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
SWE-benchVerified / published open-model reportsResolved · Higher is better49.2%harness comparison: provider-reported; settings differ across models · Original January 2025 R1 model card; SWE Verified resolved; not R1-0528DeepSeek ↗ (opens in a new tab)provider reported
Terminal-Bench2.1 / Artificial AnalysisPass@1 · Higher is better19.101%DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25); 89 tasks; Terminus 2; e2b; three repeatsArtificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent
Terminal-Bench4.0 / mini-swe-agentTask success · Higher is better0%harness: mini-swe-agent · repeats: 3 · selection: best reported configuration per release · DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Artificial Analysis (opens in a new tab)independent